Comparison tool

Compare LNG vessels and containment systems

Pick up to 4 entries, or start from a preset. Entries are compared on described characteristics only — no scores or rankings are applied.

Educational data

Preset comparisons

Select entries (1/4)

SPB

Prismatic Type B tanks with a flat deck and no sloshing limits.

Operational role
Conventional Ocean-Going LNG Carrier
Containment system
SPB / Self-Supporting Prismatic Type B
Capacity class
Conventional (indicative: approximately 125,000–180,000 m³)
Indicative capacity
88K–165K m³
Tank geometry
Independent prismatic tanks with internal swash bulkheads
Typical application
Floating units and trades requiring unrestricted filling levels
Hull-space efficiency
Moderate to high — prismatic shape follows the hull better than spheres
Infrastructure requirements
Conventional terminals; flat deck suits offshore topside arrangements
Propulsion options
DFDE / TFDE · ME-GI
BOG management
BOG as fuel · Reliquefaction
Advantages
No sloshing restrictions at any filling level — Flat weather deck simplifies topside arrangement for floating units — Leak-before-failure design with a full secondary drip tray
Limitations
Higher steel weight and build cost per cubic metre — Small operating fleet, so benchmarking data is limited
Typical routes
Alaska – Japan · Arctic feeder services · Floating production offtake

Technical information

Status
Educational overview
Last reviewed
15 September 2026
Source status
Sources pending editorial review.

Technical parameters are indicative and may vary by vessel design, generation, shipyard, operator and intended service.