Comparison tool

Compare LNG vessels and containment systems

Pick up to 4 entries, or start from a preset. Entries are compared on described characteristics only — no scores or rankings are applied.

Educational data

Preset comparisons

Select entries (1/4)

Conversion FSRU

An existing carrier hull reused as floating import infrastructure.

Operational role
LNG Carrier Conversion / Conversion-Based FSRU
Containment system
GTT NO96 Membrane · GTT Mark III Membrane · Moss / Spherical Self-Supporting Type B
Capacity class
Conventional (indicative: approximately 125,000–180,000 m³)
Indicative capacity
125K–170K m³
Tank geometry
Inherited from the original carrier — membrane prismatic or spherical
Typical application
Import projects adding floating regasification capacity from an existing hull
Hull-space efficiency
Inherited from the original vessel, with deck space reassigned to topsides
Infrastructure requirements
Mooring or jetty arrangement, high-pressure send-out connection and pipeline tie-in
Propulsion options
Steam turbine · DFDE / TFDE
BOG management
BOG as fuel · Gas combustion unit
Advantages
Reuses an existing hull and containment system — Can support phased import capacity where onshore terminals are not yet built — May retain carrier capability depending on the conversion scope
Limitations
Inherits the age, condition and containment characteristics of the original ship — Added topsides change weight distribution, power demand and hazardous-area layout — Send-out capability and mooring limits are entirely project-specific
Typical routes
Moored at an import location · Occasional relocation voyages

Technical information

Status
Educational overview
Last reviewed
15 September 2026
Source status
Sources pending editorial review.

Technical parameters are indicative and may vary by vessel design, generation, shipyard, operator and intended service.