Comparison tool

Compare LNG vessels and containment systems

Pick up to 4 entries, or start from a preset. Entries are compared on described characteristics only — no scores or rankings are applied.

Educational data

Preset comparisons

Select entries (1/4)

FSRU

A regasification terminal that can be moored where demand appears.

Operational role
FSRU
Containment system
GTT Mark III Membrane · GTT NO96 Membrane · Moss / Spherical Self-Supporting Type B
Capacity class
Conventional (indicative: approximately 125,000–180,000 m³)
Indicative capacity
125K–174K m³
Tank geometry
Membrane or spherical tanks with a regasification topside
Typical application
Fast-track import capacity where an onshore terminal is not viable
Hull-space efficiency
Depends on the containment system selected for the hull
Infrastructure requirements
Sheltered berth or turret mooring plus a high-pressure gas connection ashore
Propulsion options
DFDE / TFDE · Steam turbine
BOG management
BOG as fuel · Reliquefaction · Gas combustion unit
Advantages
Rapid deployment for new or emergency import capacity — Redeployable if demand shifts to another market — Can trade as a conventional carrier when not in terminal service
Limitations
Send-out rate is lower than a large onshore terminal — Requires a sheltered berth and a gas pipeline interface ashore
Typical routes
Permanently moored import terminals · Seasonal redeployment between markets

Technical information

Status
Educational overview
Last reviewed
15 September 2026
Source status
Sources pending editorial review.

Technical parameters are indicative and may vary by vessel design, generation, shipyard, operator and intended service.