Comparison tool

Compare LNG vessels and containment systems

Pick up to 4 entries, or start from a preset. Entries are compared on described characteristics only — no scores or rankings are applied.

Educational data

Preset comparisons

Select entries (1/4)

FSU

Storage capacity on the water, without regasification on board.

Operational role
FSU
Containment system
GTT NO96 Membrane · Moss / Spherical Self-Supporting Type B
Capacity class
Conventional (indicative: approximately 125,000–180,000 m³)
Indicative capacity
125K–180K m³
Tank geometry
Membrane or spherical tanks, storage only
Typical application
Moored storage buffering a regasification plant, a bunkering hub or a transhipment terminal
Hull-space efficiency
As per the containment system of the original carrier hull
Infrastructure requirements
Dedicated mooring and a separate regasification or transfer facility
Propulsion options
Steam turbine · DFDE / TFDE
BOG management
BOG as fuel · Gas combustion unit
Advantages
Extends usable life of older carrier hulls — Adds storage volume without onshore tank construction — Buffers supply between large carriers and smaller distribution vessels
Limitations
Provides no regasification capability on its own — Requires a compatible partner unit or shore plant
Typical routes
Permanently moored storage at transhipment and bunkering hubs

Technical information

Status
Educational overview
Last reviewed
15 September 2026
Source status
Sources pending editorial review.

Technical parameters are indicative and may vary by vessel design, generation, shipyard, operator and intended service.